Personal Trainers - Get healthy For New Certification Regulations
Personal Trainers - Get healthy For New Certification Regulations
The rewards of an career in personal training are clear: Personal fitness trainers have the opportunity to directly help people grow their health and fitness. Consumers across the country are increasingly trying to find trustworthy professionals for responsible and up-to-date suggestions about exercise, weight loss tweaking a healthy lifestyle.
A little less clear could be the multitude of recent proposed changes in legislation that could affect those considering personal trainer certification. In case you are considering a career in fitness or a related field, staying current with personal trainer certification requirements is really a critical aspect of delivering responsible want to clients. Gost Russian standard
Why change the laws regulating fitness expert certification?
A series of lawsuits through which personal trainers were charged with dangerous negligence may have prompted the move towards greater regulation of personal trainer certification. Probably the most widely reported cases is at 2002, when a New York woman suffered a stroke and later died, allegedly due to complications from dietary supplements that were recommended by an inadequately qualified fitness expert. Other personal injury lawsuits against trainers soon followed.
In 2007, some of those trainers fought back, filing a case of their own against an accreditation agency that, the trainers said, provided inadequate instruction. The category action suit, which occurred in California, shows how fitness instructors and fitness professionals took a leading role in improving regulation within the personal training industry.
What changes are taking place that affect personal trainers?
As early as 2003, the National Board of Fitness Examiners (NBFE) began to promote nationwide industry standards form of hosting trainer certification. One of the proposed changes advocated from the NBFE are more consistent standards for certification along with improved regulation of the accreditation of certifying agencies, to help ensure the health and safety of consumers.
However, state governments have also entered the fray, with New Jersey, Maryland, Georgia, the District of Columbia, Louisiana, and, of late, California and Massachusetts, proposing legislation that will regulate the certification of non-public trainers and possibly even require licensing of trainers. One prominent industry group, the International Health, Racquet and Sportsclub Association (IHRSA), has strongly lobbied against such legislation, citing the efforts of the NBFE and a multitude of other organizations to modify the accreditation of certification providers without requiring permission.
While the NBFE itself looks after a neutral position about licensing, they stress the value of creating nationwide standards, including a standardized exam web hosting trainers that would result in the licensing process consistent from state to state, rather than creating new and various legislation and licensing procedures per state.
Have any laws been passed that alter the requirements for personal trainers?
Up to now, only one of the bills introduced has yet passed into law: a Louisiana bill requiring licensing of exercise physiologists. According to Stuart Goldman, Managing Editor of Club Industry's Fitness Business Pro, by May 1, 2009, the Massachusetts bill was in committee, the New Jersey and District of Columbia bills were pending, and the Maryland and Georgia bills were inactive but supposed to be reintroduced. Gost Russian standards
The California bill has transpired the Senate and is also currently being considered through the Assembly. However, the legislation being considered in California differs slightly for the reason that it does not require licensing. Instead, it requires that personal trainer certification be provided by an agency licensed by the National Commission of Certifying Agencies (NCCA) or by a business accredited by the Council for Higher Education Accreditation (CHEA) or the Department of Education (DOE).
How does this affect me?
If your state passes a law requiring licensing of private trainers, or changed the requirements for personal training certification, what am i saying for you? If you are looking for any career as a fitness expert, keep an eye out for schools which might be accredited by one of many agencies above. The NCCA has a list of accredited certification programs for private training and related fields, and the CHEA keeps directories of accredited programs along with recognized accrediting organizations.
In case you already possess fitness trainer certification and are worried about recertification, contact your personal training school for details about possible changes to requirements where you live, or get in touch with a specialist organization such as the National Board of Fitness Examiners or IDEA Health & Fitness Association.
The rewards of an career in personal training are clear: Personal fitness trainers have the opportunity to directly help people grow their health and fitness. Consumers across the country are increasingly trying to find trustworthy professionals for responsible and up-to-date suggestions about exercise, weight loss tweaking a healthy lifestyle.
A little less clear could be the multitude of recent proposed changes in legislation that could affect those considering personal trainer certification. In case you are considering a career in fitness or a related field, staying current with personal trainer certification requirements is really a critical aspect of delivering responsible want to clients. Gost Russian standard
Why change the laws regulating fitness expert certification?
A series of lawsuits through which personal trainers were charged with dangerous negligence may have prompted the move towards greater regulation of personal trainer certification. Probably the most widely reported cases is at 2002, when a New York woman suffered a stroke and later died, allegedly due to complications from dietary supplements that were recommended by an inadequately qualified fitness expert. Other personal injury lawsuits against trainers soon followed.
In 2007, some of those trainers fought back, filing a case of their own against an accreditation agency that, the trainers said, provided inadequate instruction. The category action suit, which occurred in California, shows how fitness instructors and fitness professionals took a leading role in improving regulation within the personal training industry.
What changes are taking place that affect personal trainers?
As early as 2003, the National Board of Fitness Examiners (NBFE) began to promote nationwide industry standards form of hosting trainer certification. One of the proposed changes advocated from the NBFE are more consistent standards for certification along with improved regulation of the accreditation of certifying agencies, to help ensure the health and safety of consumers.
However, state governments have also entered the fray, with New Jersey, Maryland, Georgia, the District of Columbia, Louisiana, and, of late, California and Massachusetts, proposing legislation that will regulate the certification of non-public trainers and possibly even require licensing of trainers. One prominent industry group, the International Health, Racquet and Sportsclub Association (IHRSA), has strongly lobbied against such legislation, citing the efforts of the NBFE and a multitude of other organizations to modify the accreditation of certification providers without requiring permission.
While the NBFE itself looks after a neutral position about licensing, they stress the value of creating nationwide standards, including a standardized exam web hosting trainers that would result in the licensing process consistent from state to state, rather than creating new and various legislation and licensing procedures per state.
Have any laws been passed that alter the requirements for personal trainers?
Up to now, only one of the bills introduced has yet passed into law: a Louisiana bill requiring licensing of exercise physiologists. According to Stuart Goldman, Managing Editor of Club Industry's Fitness Business Pro, by May 1, 2009, the Massachusetts bill was in committee, the New Jersey and District of Columbia bills were pending, and the Maryland and Georgia bills were inactive but supposed to be reintroduced. Gost Russian standards
The California bill has transpired the Senate and is also currently being considered through the Assembly. However, the legislation being considered in California differs slightly for the reason that it does not require licensing. Instead, it requires that personal trainer certification be provided by an agency licensed by the National Commission of Certifying Agencies (NCCA) or by a business accredited by the Council for Higher Education Accreditation (CHEA) or the Department of Education (DOE).
How does this affect me?
If your state passes a law requiring licensing of private trainers, or changed the requirements for personal training certification, what am i saying for you? If you are looking for any career as a fitness expert, keep an eye out for schools which might be accredited by one of many agencies above. The NCCA has a list of accredited certification programs for private training and related fields, and the CHEA keeps directories of accredited programs along with recognized accrediting organizations.
In case you already possess fitness trainer certification and are worried about recertification, contact your personal training school for details about possible changes to requirements where you live, or get in touch with a specialist organization such as the National Board of Fitness Examiners or IDEA Health & Fitness Association.